Based on Frank Miller's graphic novel of the same name, "300" tells the story of the Battle of Thermopylae, where a small force of Spartans battled against a Persian army that vastly out-numbered it. Although the Spartans were ultimately defeated, their sacrifice bought time for the Greeks to mass an army that would be able to stand up against the Persians.
Like "Apocalypto" earlier in the year, "300" is an action movie with a historical setting. And like "Apocalypto", it makes no pretense about being 100% historically accurate (although some of the film's more 'memorable' lines - "Tonight we dine in Hell!" for example - do come from classical sources). The film is stronger on action than it is on characterisation - the original comic is not Frank Miller's strongest piece of work when it comes to depth of character; it's partially inspired by the 1962 'sword & sandals' film "The 300 Spartans" which he saw as a child.
Director Zack Snyder (who previously brought us the remake of 'Dawn Of The Dead' - Romero's original concept of 'survivors in a mall' collides with the zombies from '28 Days Later') brings a visceral visual feast to the screen; heads and limbs are removed in glorious slo-mo, the Persian King Xerxes has a tent full of exotic sirens (rarely do you see credits for 'Transsexual Asian 1' or 'Long Neck Woman' at the end of a film), the Spartans are armoured in little more than leather thongs and cloaks. '300' has a 15 certificate, I'd be interested to know how violent a film has to be for an 18 certificate these days...
"300" is filmed using a technique that proved effective for an earlier adaptation of a Frank Miller graphic novel "Sin City". Actors were shot in front of a bluescreen and other visual elements were generated digitally and added in post-production, thus enabling the filmmakers to capture the distinctive feel of Miller's imagery. This give the film an appropriately 'other worldly' feel to it.
Although no flawless masterpiece, I enjoyed '300' for what it was; a big-screen blockbuster.
One thing I should add was that every time I saw (and heard) Gerard Butler as the Spartan King Leonidas I was reminded of Sean Connery's King Agamemnon in "Time Bandits", which has prompted me to give it a long-overdue repeat viewing.
Saturday, 24 March 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
nice! I shall be going to see it tomrrow for some "visceral visual feasting".
[interesting use of captcha]
I was really dissappointed with it, the trailer got me worried, had that naff goth feel similar to Underworld at times with some really cheesy moments, yet other parts looked fantastic. And that is pretty much how the film panned out, the script was pretty dire and whilst some imagery was truly superb, some felt like a Meatloaf video it was so corny and overall the script just couldn't do the actors justice.
right I've seen it now.
I agree with the reviews - he stole bits mercilessly from other movies, the dialogue wasn't great and there was a not very successful attempt to give the Spartan good guys some justification for the gratuitous violence. And it was, gratuitous. However, it was fairly close to the comic, etc. [least we forget the league of extraordinary gentlemen!] BUT...
As Oli would say, AH BUT! Gonna say it again, AH BUT!
I felt an overwhelming urge to pick up a sword and start practicing my shield and spear technique - which is really quite rubbish. In addition I need to start pumping iron, getting bigger and go to warrr!
So yeah, it was really good at accessing my lower brain functions. Constantly, across a 2 hour period.
Post a Comment